Skip to main content
Number №4, 2025
Legal Sovereignty of the Individual in Digital Healthcare in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Number №3, 2025
Digital Health: Forecast for 2025-2030
Number №2, 2025
Digital technologies in remote monitoring of childbirth with a Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Number №1, 2025
Digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention in older adults
Number №4, 2024
Computer reconstruction of the interaction of genes associated with Angelman syndrome
Number №3, 2024
Telemedicine today: trends in the use of telemedicine consultations based on regional experience
Number №2, 2024
Mobile apps for psychological well-being: user attitudes and definition of requirements
Number №1, 2024
Diagnosis in the era of digital medicine
Number №4, 2023
Artificial intelligence in Russian healthcare: collecting and preparing data for machine learning
Number №3, 2023
China as a supplier of medical equipment in the Russian Federation. Options for cooperation and features of working with Chinese suppliers
Number №2, 2023
Experience in teaching telemedicine in the system of higher professional education The attitude of medical workers to telemedicine technologies
Number №4, 2022
Physician burnout: the hidden healthcare crisis. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №3, 2022
Interaction of clinical and diagnostic medicine. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №2, 2022
Mobile applications for mental health self-management: a review of customers’ opinions Ultrasound robots: ready-to-use solutions and perspective directions
Number №1, 2022
Digital transformation of the pathological service as a way to improve the quality of medical care
Number №4, 2021
Clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: are doctors ready to follow them? Results of an online survey of doctors.
Number №3, 2021
Виртуальная реальность (VR) в клинической медицине: международный и российский опыт
Number №2, 2021
Дистанционные консультации пациентов: что изменилось за 20 лет?
Number №1, 2021
Experience of participation in the blood pressure telemonitoring pilot project of the Ministry of Healthcare
Number №4, 2020
Автоматизация процесса выявления у беременных заболевания COVID-19
Number №3, 2020
Remote cognitive behavioral therapy for stress disorder associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №2, 2020
Distance education at a medical school during the COVID-19 pandemic: the first experience through the eyes of students
Number №1-2, 2018
Ответственность при использовании телемедицины: врач или юрист Скрининг меланомы: искусственный интеллект, mHealth и теледерматология
Number №3, 2018 год
II Всероссийский форум по телемедицине, цифровизации здравоохранения и медицинскому маркетингу «ТЕЛЕМЕДФОРУМ 2019» Эффективность телемедицинских консультаций «пациент-врач» Телереабилитация: рандомизированное исследование исходов
Number №1-2, 2019
Роль искусственного интеллекта в медицине Информационная система поддержки принятия врачебных решений
Number №1, 2020
Technologies for continuous monitoring of blood pressure: prospects for practical application Telemedicine technologies in the Chinese army
Number №2, 2017
Primary telemedicine consultation "patient-doctor": first systematization of methodology
Number №1, 2017
1. A systematic review of using Internet messengers in telemedicine 2. Telemedicine and social networks in the fight against drug addiction
Number №1, 2016
1. The Experience of the Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais, Brazil 2. The Remote Monitoring of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure:The Organizational Impact..
Number №1, 2015
Teleassessment for diagnosis and treatment in urology Efficiency of telemedicine at the northern regions Russian Federation A.L. Tsaregorodtsev

Modifiable Indoor Environmental Factors: Impact on Human Health and Digital Monitoring

DOI: 10.29188/2712-9217-2023-9-1-21-48
For citation: <p>Lebedev G.S., Shaderkin I.A., Lebedeva N.A. Modifiable Indoor Environmental Factors: Impact on Human Health and Digital Monitoring. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health 2023;9(1):21-48; https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2023-9-1-21-48</p>
I.A. Shaderkin, G.S. Lebedev, N.A. Lebedeva
Information about authors:
  • Lebedev G.S. – MD, PhD, professor, Head of the Department of Information and Internet Technologies at Sechenov University; Head of the Department of Innovative Development and Scientific Design of the Central Research Institute of Organization and Informatization of Health Care of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Moscow, Russia 
  • Shaderkin I.A. – MD, PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Electronic Health, Institute of Digital Medicine, Sechenov University; Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-2674 
  • Lebedeva N.A. – 4th year student of the Institute of Public Health named after F.F. Erisman of the First Moscow State Medical University named after M.I. THEM. Sechenov (Sechenov University); Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7647-7209 
7561
Download PDF

Introduction. Environment and its indicators as health risk factors have been widely studied for a long time. The atmospheric air and factors polluting it are confirmed as the most important environmental factors that influence human’s health. Nevertheless, people spend up to 90% of their time indoors. Indicators of indoor environment have another origins and they can also have another scales. At the same time, these factors can be influenced easily, thus decreasing their negative impact on health. 

The aim of our review is to study information about impact of physical factors of indoor environment on human organism and methods of maintaining them within safe level. For analysis we chose several factors depending on their prevalence, opportunities to measure their levels and availability of the methods to correct them. 

Materials and methods. The search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar and Elibrary data bases. Fundamental literature, such as legislative act, were used. 

Results. Nowadays, disease prevention via elimination of risk factors influence on human health is gaining more and more attention. There are various devices that capture air indicators in houses and public buildings. Their use helps to maintain parameters within comfort level. We summarized information about the most important and wide-spread factors, their impact on health, methods for their measurement and solutions for their correction. Nevertheless, there are not enough devices which enable to monitor several important factors simultaneously. That problem leads to using different devices and each of them need calibration and technical service. 

Conclusion. Nowadays the impact of environmental factors on human health is widely studied and new information about this problem appears constantly. Dynamic monitoring of indicators of environmental factors is necessary for decreasing negative influence on health. An important step towards simultaneous monitoring of the most significant indoor factors is developing of technical solutions which can remove the duty to service many devices separately. These technical solutions can also propose methods for maintaining these factors within safe levels. 

Attachment Size
Download 1.07 MB
Keywords: indoor environment; physical environmental factors; risk factors; microclimate; digital monitoring