Skip to main content
Number №4, 2025
Legal Sovereignty of the Individual in Digital Healthcare in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Number №3, 2025
Digital Health: Forecast for 2025-2030
Number №2, 2025
Digital technologies in remote monitoring of childbirth with a Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Number №1, 2025
Digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention in older adults
Number №4, 2024
Computer reconstruction of the interaction of genes associated with Angelman syndrome
Number №3, 2024
Telemedicine today: trends in the use of telemedicine consultations based on regional experience
Number №2, 2024
Mobile apps for psychological well-being: user attitudes and definition of requirements
Number №1, 2024
Diagnosis in the era of digital medicine
Number №4, 2023
Artificial intelligence in Russian healthcare: collecting and preparing data for machine learning
Number №3, 2023
China as a supplier of medical equipment in the Russian Federation. Options for cooperation and features of working with Chinese suppliers
Number №2, 2023
Experience in teaching telemedicine in the system of higher professional education The attitude of medical workers to telemedicine technologies
Number №4, 2022
Physician burnout: the hidden healthcare crisis. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №3, 2022
Interaction of clinical and diagnostic medicine. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №2, 2022
Mobile applications for mental health self-management: a review of customers’ opinions Ultrasound robots: ready-to-use solutions and perspective directions
Number №1, 2022
Digital transformation of the pathological service as a way to improve the quality of medical care
Number №4, 2021
Clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: are doctors ready to follow them? Results of an online survey of doctors.
Number №3, 2021
Виртуальная реальность (VR) в клинической медицине: международный и российский опыт
Number №2, 2021
Дистанционные консультации пациентов: что изменилось за 20 лет?
Number №1, 2021
Experience of participation in the blood pressure telemonitoring pilot project of the Ministry of Healthcare
Number №4, 2020
Автоматизация процесса выявления у беременных заболевания COVID-19
Number №3, 2020
Remote cognitive behavioral therapy for stress disorder associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №2, 2020
Distance education at a medical school during the COVID-19 pandemic: the first experience through the eyes of students
Number №1-2, 2018
Ответственность при использовании телемедицины: врач или юрист Скрининг меланомы: искусственный интеллект, mHealth и теледерматология
Number №3, 2018 год
II Всероссийский форум по телемедицине, цифровизации здравоохранения и медицинскому маркетингу «ТЕЛЕМЕДФОРУМ 2019» Эффективность телемедицинских консультаций «пациент-врач» Телереабилитация: рандомизированное исследование исходов
Number №1-2, 2019
Роль искусственного интеллекта в медицине Информационная система поддержки принятия врачебных решений
Number №1, 2020
Technologies for continuous monitoring of blood pressure: prospects for practical application Telemedicine technologies in the Chinese army
Number №2, 2017
Primary telemedicine consultation "patient-doctor": first systematization of methodology
Number №1, 2017
1. A systematic review of using Internet messengers in telemedicine 2. Telemedicine and social networks in the fight against drug addiction
Number №1, 2016
1. The Experience of the Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais, Brazil 2. The Remote Monitoring of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure:The Organizational Impact..
Number №1, 2015
Teleassessment for diagnosis and treatment in urology Efficiency of telemedicine at the northern regions Russian Federation A.L. Tsaregorodtsev

Remote monitoring complex for chronic non-communicable diseases

DOI: 10.29188/2712-9217-2022-8-1-7-14
For citation: Lebedev G.S., Vladzymyrskyy A.V., Shaderkin I.A., Dudareva V.P. Remote monitoring complex for chronic noncommunicable diseases. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health 2022;8(1):7-14; <a href="http://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2022-8-1-7-14">https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2022-8-1-7-14</a>
Lebedev G.S., Vladzymyrskyy A.V., Shaderkin I.A., Dudareva V.P.
Information about authors:
  • Lebedev G.S. – PhD, professor, Head of the Department of Information and Internet Technologies, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4289-2102
  • Vladzymyrskyy A.V. – MD, PhD, Deputy Director for Research, Research and Practical Clinical Center for Diagnostics and Telemedicine Technologies of the Moscow Department of Health; professor, Department of Information and Internet Technologies, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2990-7736
  • Shaderkin I.A. – MD, PhD, Head of the Laboratory of E-Health, Institute of Digital Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University); Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-2674
  • Dudareva V.P. – Head of Management Automation Department, Surgut Municipal Clinical Polyclinic N2; Surgut, Khanty-Mansi Region, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-0606
7301
Download PDF

Introduction. Chronic noncommunicable diseases are a significant medical, demographic and socioeconomic problem. Telemedicine technologies are one of the tools to solve it. However, the question of the large-scale application of affordable, patient-oriented technological solutions remains open.

Objective: evaluate the feasibility of the mobile set for monitoring of the health status of patients with chronic non-communicable diseases.

Materials and methods. Design: feasibility study. Acceptability, demand, implementation, feasibility, integration and adaptability were studied. There are 14 patients suffering from high blood pressure or diabetes mellitus are included in an observation group. The telemedicine monitoring kit was used (as preclinical trial). Research methods: clinical, sociological, and statistical.

Results. The base station and medical devices were used for telemonitoring in frame of dispensary observation. The reference level of blood pressure achieved in 100.0% of cases. This is an evidence of the clinical significance. The level of technological defects was minimal (2.3%). A statistically significant achievement and stable retention of physiological parameters reference level were achieve when telemonitoring was carry out for 2 months and more. There is a high level of evaluation of the telemedicine kit quality both by patients and by medical staff.

Conclusions. The overall level of patient adherence to telemonitoring via telemedicine kit is 78.6%. It is expedient to use this set of devices for telemonitoring of the health status of patients with blood hypertension and, potentially, with other chronic non-communicable diseases.

Attachment Size
Download 141 KB
Keywords: telemedicine technologies; telemonitoring; blood hypertension; diabetes mellitus; patient adherence