Skip to main content
Number №4, 2025
Legal Sovereignty of the Individual in Digital Healthcare in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Number №3, 2025
Digital Health: Forecast for 2025-2030
Number №2, 2025
Digital technologies in remote monitoring of childbirth with a Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Number №1, 2025
Digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention in older adults
Number №4, 2024
Computer reconstruction of the interaction of genes associated with Angelman syndrome
Number №3, 2024
Telemedicine today: trends in the use of telemedicine consultations based on regional experience
Number №2, 2024
Mobile apps for psychological well-being: user attitudes and definition of requirements
Number №1, 2024
Diagnosis in the era of digital medicine
Number №4, 2023
Artificial intelligence in Russian healthcare: collecting and preparing data for machine learning
Number №3, 2023
China as a supplier of medical equipment in the Russian Federation. Options for cooperation and features of working with Chinese suppliers
Number №2, 2023
Experience in teaching telemedicine in the system of higher professional education The attitude of medical workers to telemedicine technologies
Number №4, 2022
Physician burnout: the hidden healthcare crisis. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №3, 2022
Interaction of clinical and diagnostic medicine. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №2, 2022
Mobile applications for mental health self-management: a review of customers’ opinions Ultrasound robots: ready-to-use solutions and perspective directions
Number №1, 2022
Digital transformation of the pathological service as a way to improve the quality of medical care
Number №4, 2021
Clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: are doctors ready to follow them? Results of an online survey of doctors.
Number №3, 2021
Виртуальная реальность (VR) в клинической медицине: международный и российский опыт
Number №2, 2021
Дистанционные консультации пациентов: что изменилось за 20 лет?
Number №1, 2021
Experience of participation in the blood pressure telemonitoring pilot project of the Ministry of Healthcare
Number №4, 2020
Автоматизация процесса выявления у беременных заболевания COVID-19
Number №3, 2020
Remote cognitive behavioral therapy for stress disorder associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №2, 2020
Distance education at a medical school during the COVID-19 pandemic: the first experience through the eyes of students
Number №1-2, 2018
Ответственность при использовании телемедицины: врач или юрист Скрининг меланомы: искусственный интеллект, mHealth и теледерматология
Number №3, 2018 год
II Всероссийский форум по телемедицине, цифровизации здравоохранения и медицинскому маркетингу «ТЕЛЕМЕДФОРУМ 2019» Эффективность телемедицинских консультаций «пациент-врач» Телереабилитация: рандомизированное исследование исходов
Number №1-2, 2019
Роль искусственного интеллекта в медицине Информационная система поддержки принятия врачебных решений
Number №1, 2020
Technologies for continuous monitoring of blood pressure: prospects for practical application Telemedicine technologies in the Chinese army
Number №2, 2017
Primary telemedicine consultation "patient-doctor": first systematization of methodology
Number №1, 2017
1. A systematic review of using Internet messengers in telemedicine 2. Telemedicine and social networks in the fight against drug addiction
Number №1, 2016
1. The Experience of the Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais, Brazil 2. The Remote Monitoring of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure:The Organizational Impact..
Number №1, 2015
Teleassessment for diagnosis and treatment in urology Efficiency of telemedicine at the northern regions Russian Federation A.L. Tsaregorodtsev

Telemedicine barriers and ways to overcome them

Number №2, 2022 - page 59-76
DOI: 10.29188/2712-9217-2022-8-2-59-76
For citation: Shaderkin I.A.Telemedicine barriers and ways to overcome them. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health 2022;8(2)59-76; https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2022-8-2-59-76
Shaderkin I.A.
Information about authors:
9818
Download PDF

The ongoing discussion of telemedicine suggests that there are barriers to the widespread adoption of telemedicine technologies in clinical practice. The article is the first to classify the barriers of the introduction of telemedicine technologies into practice. There are 4 main barriers: technological, legal, economic and methodological. At the end of the description of each barrier, ways to overcome them are given.

The technological barrier includes: the inconvenience of using existing tools, poor integration of telemedicine platforms with existing medical information systems (MIS), Poor standardization of information exchange protocols between sources (devices), information systems from different manufacturers, a small amount and low quality of digitized information about the state of human health and others. In the legal barrier, it is prohibited to make a diagnosis and prescribe treatment when providing medical care using telemedicine technologies, and also there are requirements for the workplace of a doctor providing TM-consultation.

Financial barriers are represented by the difficulties of financing telemedicine - the lack of compulsory medical insurance tariffs, the erroneous opinion that telemedicine should reduce healthcare costs or does not require separate financing at all.

The lack of methodological support for telemedicine - clinical studies, publications, methodological and clinical recommendations, training courses and programs on telemedicine for students, leads to a low commitment of doctors to use telemedicine in their work. The process of implementing telemedicine technologies is unavoidable. However, there is no doubt that telemedicine will eventually become a familiar and indispensable tool in the hands of doctors. Sooner or later, even without our active participation, these barriers will be overcome.

Attachment Size
Download 649.52 KB
Keywords: telemedicine; remote technologies; technological barriers to implementation