Skip to main content
Number №4, 2025
Legal Sovereignty of the Individual in Digital Healthcare in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Number №3, 2025
Digital Health: Forecast for 2025-2030
Number №2, 2025
Digital technologies in remote monitoring of childbirth with a Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Number №1, 2025
Digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention in older adults
Number №4, 2024
Computer reconstruction of the interaction of genes associated with Angelman syndrome
Number №3, 2024
Telemedicine today: trends in the use of telemedicine consultations based on regional experience
Number №2, 2024
Mobile apps for psychological well-being: user attitudes and definition of requirements
Number №1, 2024
Diagnosis in the era of digital medicine
Number №4, 2023
Artificial intelligence in Russian healthcare: collecting and preparing data for machine learning
Number №3, 2023
China as a supplier of medical equipment in the Russian Federation. Options for cooperation and features of working with Chinese suppliers
Number №2, 2023
Experience in teaching telemedicine in the system of higher professional education The attitude of medical workers to telemedicine technologies
Number №4, 2022
Physician burnout: the hidden healthcare crisis. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №3, 2022
Interaction of clinical and diagnostic medicine. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №2, 2022
Mobile applications for mental health self-management: a review of customers’ opinions Ultrasound robots: ready-to-use solutions and perspective directions
Number №1, 2022
Digital transformation of the pathological service as a way to improve the quality of medical care
Number №4, 2021
Clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: are doctors ready to follow them? Results of an online survey of doctors.
Number №3, 2021
Виртуальная реальность (VR) в клинической медицине: международный и российский опыт
Number №2, 2021
Дистанционные консультации пациентов: что изменилось за 20 лет?
Number №1, 2021
Experience of participation in the blood pressure telemonitoring pilot project of the Ministry of Healthcare
Number №4, 2020
Автоматизация процесса выявления у беременных заболевания COVID-19
Number №3, 2020
Remote cognitive behavioral therapy for stress disorder associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №2, 2020
Distance education at a medical school during the COVID-19 pandemic: the first experience through the eyes of students
Number №1-2, 2018
Ответственность при использовании телемедицины: врач или юрист Скрининг меланомы: искусственный интеллект, mHealth и теледерматология
Number №3, 2018 год
II Всероссийский форум по телемедицине, цифровизации здравоохранения и медицинскому маркетингу «ТЕЛЕМЕДФОРУМ 2019» Эффективность телемедицинских консультаций «пациент-врач» Телереабилитация: рандомизированное исследование исходов
Number №1-2, 2019
Роль искусственного интеллекта в медицине Информационная система поддержки принятия врачебных решений
Number №1, 2020
Technologies for continuous monitoring of blood pressure: prospects for practical application Telemedicine technologies in the Chinese army
Number №2, 2017
Primary telemedicine consultation "patient-doctor": first systematization of methodology
Number №1, 2017
1. A systematic review of using Internet messengers in telemedicine 2. Telemedicine and social networks in the fight against drug addiction
Number №1, 2016
1. The Experience of the Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais, Brazil 2. The Remote Monitoring of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure:The Organizational Impact..
Number №1, 2015
Teleassessment for diagnosis and treatment in urology Efficiency of telemedicine at the northern regions Russian Federation A.L. Tsaregorodtsev

Distance education in a medical university during a pandemic COVID-19: the first experience through the eyes of students

DOI: 10.29188/2542-2413-2020-6-2-3-9
For citation: Levanov V.M., Perevezentsev E.A., Gavrilova A.N. Distance education in a medical university during a pandemic COVID-19: the first experience through the eyes of students. Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health 2020;(2):3-9
V.M. Levanov, E.A. Perevezencev, A.N. Gavrilova
Information about authors:
  • Levanov V.M. – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Social Medicine and Health Organization of the Volga Research Medical Institute of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Leading Researcher of the Laboratory of Medical Informatics and Telemedicine of the State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation – «Institute of Biomedical problems RAS», Moscow, Russia.  ORCID 0000-0002-4625-6840
  • Perevezentsev E.A. – Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of Social Medicine and Public Health Organization of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Privolzhsky Research Medical Institute» of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia. ORCID 0000-0002-8537-6482
  • Gavrilova A.N. – student of the medical faculty of the Volga Research Medical Institute of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
15900
Download PDF

Introduction: Present pandemic situation has determined using methods of distance education at organisations of higher education including medical universities.

Aim of this study was to examine medical students’ attitude to transition to distance forms of education for a period of pandemic.

Materials and methods.The authors conducted a questionnaire of 129 students about their attitude to distance education, assessment of its positive and negative characteristics and suggestions for improvement of the model implemented during two first weeks.

Results: In 2002 at Research University an implementation of distance education technologies started. The website of distance education (WoDE) http://sdo.pimunn.net is essential to students. In March 2020 the University switched to full distance learning model due to COVID-19 pandemic. The questionnaire among students allowed to reveal positive aspects of distance education: reduction of time and cost for moving between university campuses and clinical bases (55,2% of students), comfort of learning in habitual home environment (60,9%), opportunity of daily schedule planning (66,9%), stress level reduction (37,9%), self-discipline, opportunity of copying and reviewing of studying material (59,7%). Among disadvantages was limitation in using

Conclusions: Despite significant experience of e-learning and regulatory framework of application of distance education technologies, their using always was considered in a comprehensive manner with traditional intramural education and such transition leads to adaptation of electronic educational environment to new conditions.

Conflict of interest. The author declare no conflict of interest

Attachment Size
Download 746.16 KB
Keywords: distance educational technologies, medicine, pandemic, e-learning, students questionnaire, COVID-19