Skip to main content
Number №4, 2025
Legal Sovereignty of the Individual in Digital Healthcare in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Number №3, 2025
Digital Health: Forecast for 2025-2030
Number №2, 2025
Digital technologies in remote monitoring of childbirth with a Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Number №1, 2025
Digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention in older adults
Number №4, 2024
Computer reconstruction of the interaction of genes associated with Angelman syndrome
Number №3, 2024
Telemedicine today: trends in the use of telemedicine consultations based on regional experience
Number №2, 2024
Mobile apps for psychological well-being: user attitudes and definition of requirements
Number №1, 2024
Diagnosis in the era of digital medicine
Number №4, 2023
Artificial intelligence in Russian healthcare: collecting and preparing data for machine learning
Number №3, 2023
China as a supplier of medical equipment in the Russian Federation. Options for cooperation and features of working with Chinese suppliers
Number №2, 2023
Experience in teaching telemedicine in the system of higher professional education The attitude of medical workers to telemedicine technologies
Number №4, 2022
Physician burnout: the hidden healthcare crisis. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №3, 2022
Interaction of clinical and diagnostic medicine. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №2, 2022
Mobile applications for mental health self-management: a review of customers’ opinions Ultrasound robots: ready-to-use solutions and perspective directions
Number №1, 2022
Digital transformation of the pathological service as a way to improve the quality of medical care
Number №4, 2021
Clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: are doctors ready to follow them? Results of an online survey of doctors.
Number №3, 2021
Виртуальная реальность (VR) в клинической медицине: международный и российский опыт
Number №2, 2021
Дистанционные консультации пациентов: что изменилось за 20 лет?
Number №1, 2021
Experience of participation in the blood pressure telemonitoring pilot project of the Ministry of Healthcare
Number №4, 2020
Автоматизация процесса выявления у беременных заболевания COVID-19
Number №3, 2020
Remote cognitive behavioral therapy for stress disorder associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №2, 2020
Distance education at a medical school during the COVID-19 pandemic: the first experience through the eyes of students
Number №1-2, 2018
Ответственность при использовании телемедицины: врач или юрист Скрининг меланомы: искусственный интеллект, mHealth и теледерматология
Number №3, 2018 год
II Всероссийский форум по телемедицине, цифровизации здравоохранения и медицинскому маркетингу «ТЕЛЕМЕДФОРУМ 2019» Эффективность телемедицинских консультаций «пациент-врач» Телереабилитация: рандомизированное исследование исходов
Number №1-2, 2019
Роль искусственного интеллекта в медицине Информационная система поддержки принятия врачебных решений
Number №1, 2020
Technologies for continuous monitoring of blood pressure: prospects for practical application Telemedicine technologies in the Chinese army
Number №2, 2017
Primary telemedicine consultation "patient-doctor": first systematization of methodology
Number №1, 2017
1. A systematic review of using Internet messengers in telemedicine 2. Telemedicine and social networks in the fight against drug addiction
Number №1, 2016
1. The Experience of the Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais, Brazil 2. The Remote Monitoring of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure:The Organizational Impact..
Number №1, 2015
Teleassessment for diagnosis and treatment in urology Efficiency of telemedicine at the northern regions Russian Federation A.L. Tsaregorodtsev

Regional caesarean section register «C-Register» – experience of digitalization of operative obstetrics on the example of the Sverdlovsk region

Number №4, 2020 - page 28-33
DOI: 10.29188/2542-2413-2020-6-4-28-33
For citation: Ankudinov N.O., Zilber N.A. Regional caesarean section register «C-Register» – experience of digitalization of operative obstetrics on the example of the Sverdlovsk region. Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health 2020;6(4):28-33; https://doi.org/10.29188/2542-2413-2020-6-4-28-33
Ankudinov N.O., Zil'ber N.A.
Information about authors:
  • Ankudinov N.O. – Obstetrician-gynecologist, head of the reception department of the regional perinatal center of the State Autonomous Health- care Institution of Sverdlovsk region «Regional children's clinical hospital», head of the obstetric remote consultation center of Sverdlovsk region; Yekaterinburg, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-4372
  • Zilber N.A. – Head of the Department of organization of medical care for mothers and children of the Ministry of health of the Sverdlovsk region; Yekaterinburg, Russia; n. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3667-6227
6577
Download PDF

Introduction. Caesarean section is one of the most common surgical procedures in the world and its frequency continues to increase, especially in developing and developed countries. While caesarean section can save lives, it is often performed without medical indications, putting women and their children at risk of high morbidity in the short or long term.

Aim. To create a single digital regional database of all caesarean section procedures. To automatize the analysis of medical organizations in online format. To conduct a continuous online monitoring of surgical interventions in obstetrics.

Materials and methods. It was decided to develop and introduce the regional register of cesarean sections «CesRegister» in the Sverdlovsk region as a structural and functional module of the automated information system «Regional Obstetric Monitoring» (AIST «RAM»). The goal of the system is to improve the quality of medical care for pregnant women and improve the systems for supporting medical decision-making in the operational obstetrics as well as to automatize the analytics of obstetric care institutions activities, including the Robson classification.

Results. AIST «RAM» allowed to collect the data on caesarian sections performed from the electronic medical records. This information, collected before the introduction of the register, provided the possibility of automated analytics and implementation of the systems for supporting medical decision-making in the operational obstetrics.

Conclusions. «CesRegister» can help to reduce the percentage of repeated cesarean sections by providing information about previous births online and enabling doctors to quickly make the right and safe decision on the management of pregnancy and childbirth.

Attachment Size
Download 909.38 KB
Keywords: information technology; healthcare; obstetrics; classification of M.S. Robson; medical decision support systems; analytics of medical organizations; cesarean sections; risk assessment of VTEO; electronic protocol of operations