Skip to main content
Number №4, 2025
Legal Sovereignty of the Individual in Digital Healthcare in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
Number №3, 2025
Digital Health: Forecast for 2025-2030
Number №2, 2025
Digital technologies in remote monitoring of childbirth with a Clinical decision support system (CDSS)
Number №1, 2025
Digital technologies for health promotion and disease prevention in older adults
Number №4, 2024
Computer reconstruction of the interaction of genes associated with Angelman syndrome
Number №3, 2024
Telemedicine today: trends in the use of telemedicine consultations based on regional experience
Number №2, 2024
Mobile apps for psychological well-being: user attitudes and definition of requirements
Number №1, 2024
Diagnosis in the era of digital medicine
Number №4, 2023
Artificial intelligence in Russian healthcare: collecting and preparing data for machine learning
Number №3, 2023
China as a supplier of medical equipment in the Russian Federation. Options for cooperation and features of working with Chinese suppliers
Number №2, 2023
Experience in teaching telemedicine in the system of higher professional education The attitude of medical workers to telemedicine technologies
Number №4, 2022
Physician burnout: the hidden healthcare crisis. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №3, 2022
Interaction of clinical and diagnostic medicine. Results of an online survey of doctors
Number №2, 2022
Mobile applications for mental health self-management: a review of customers’ opinions Ultrasound robots: ready-to-use solutions and perspective directions
Number №1, 2022
Digital transformation of the pathological service as a way to improve the quality of medical care
Number №4, 2021
Clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation: are doctors ready to follow them? Results of an online survey of doctors.
Number №3, 2021
Виртуальная реальность (VR) в клинической медицине: международный и российский опыт
Number №2, 2021
Дистанционные консультации пациентов: что изменилось за 20 лет?
Number №1, 2021
Experience of participation in the blood pressure telemonitoring pilot project of the Ministry of Healthcare
Number №4, 2020
Автоматизация процесса выявления у беременных заболевания COVID-19
Number №3, 2020
Remote cognitive behavioral therapy for stress disorder associated with the COVID-19 pandemic
Number №2, 2020
Distance education at a medical school during the COVID-19 pandemic: the first experience through the eyes of students
Number №1-2, 2018
Ответственность при использовании телемедицины: врач или юрист Скрининг меланомы: искусственный интеллект, mHealth и теледерматология
Number №3, 2018 год
II Всероссийский форум по телемедицине, цифровизации здравоохранения и медицинскому маркетингу «ТЕЛЕМЕДФОРУМ 2019» Эффективность телемедицинских консультаций «пациент-врач» Телереабилитация: рандомизированное исследование исходов
Number №1-2, 2019
Роль искусственного интеллекта в медицине Информационная система поддержки принятия врачебных решений
Number №1, 2020
Technologies for continuous monitoring of blood pressure: prospects for practical application Telemedicine technologies in the Chinese army
Number №2, 2017
Primary telemedicine consultation "patient-doctor": first systematization of methodology
Number №1, 2017
1. A systematic review of using Internet messengers in telemedicine 2. Telemedicine and social networks in the fight against drug addiction
Number №1, 2016
1. The Experience of the Telehealth Network of Minas Gerais, Brazil 2. The Remote Monitoring of Patients with Congestive Heart Failure:The Organizational Impact..
Number №1, 2015
Teleassessment for diagnosis and treatment in urology Efficiency of telemedicine at the northern regions Russian Federation A.L. Tsaregorodtsev

Remote medical consultations for patients: what has changed in Russia in 20 years

DOI: 10.29188/2712-9217-2021-7-2-7-17
For citation: Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A. Remote medical consultations for patients: what has changed in Russia in 20 years. Russian Journal of Telemedicine and E-Health 2021;7(2):7-17;<br /> https://doi.org/10.29188/2712-9217-2021-7-2-7-17
Shaderkin I.A., Shaderkina V.A.
Information about authors:

Shaderkin I.A. – PhD, Head of the Laboratory of Electronic Health, Institute of Digital Medicine, Sechenov University; Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-2674

Shaderkina V.A. – Scientific editor of the urological information portal UroWeb.ru; Moscow, Russia; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-4129

44264
Download PDF

Introduction. 2020 has sparked explosive growth in telemedicine, especially remote patient consultation and remote patient monitoring techniques.

Materials and methods. The authors analyzed data from 169 articles from Pubmed and 47 articles from Elibrary.ru, 117 analytical reviews of Internet resources, Federal Laws on the keywords «remote patient consultation», «mobile applications for patients», «telemedicine», «pandemic». For this publication, 49 publications were selected, as well as the authors' own opinions and experiences.

Results. Today remote consulting in Russia is used in the case of an initial consultation – a preventive appointment, referral to clinics, obtaining a second medical opinion with the possibility of prescribing additional examinations. Over the past 20 years, there has been an active growth in the development of remote consultations, long-term monitoring of patients' health, the introduction of mobile applications for monitoring vital signs of the body. An important point is the legal regulation of the provisions on the use of telemedicine technologies, however, it remains imperfect and requires improvement. The COVID pandemic has become a driver for the development of TM technologies in the state healthcare system.

Conclusions. TM has transformed from conventional consultations to long-term (continuous) monitoring of health status using medical devices, which can be considered one of the most promising new areas with clinical efficacy. TM technologies are gradually becoming a familiar tool in clinical practice and may become routine for doctors and patients even after the end of the pandemic.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Attachment Size
Download 456.69 KB
Keywords: remote patient consultations; remote patient monitoring; remote health monitoring; COVID-19 pandemic